Once Tony Daley 
opens his legs, 
you've got a problem.
Howard Wilkinson
 
          
 
 

Irish Clubs Must Look to Europe
 

 

Despite encouraging performances from the three Irish representatives in Europe this season, there has been little over the years to challenge the conventional wisdom that Irish clubs will never be good enough to compete at the highest level. It appears now, though, that the day may soon be coming when they don't compete in Europe at any level.

Leaks from Uefa, probably under pressure from the continent's biggest clubs, suggest that football clubs lacking a certain level of wealth could be excluded from taking part in top European competition. Hopefully, this will not happen. Nevertheless, the mere suggestion should be a spur to Irish clubs to consider more closely what they must do to ensure that they deserve to play with the best.

Twenty-five years ago, former internationals John Giles and Eamon Dunphy took control of Irish club Shamrock Rovers and proclaimed that they would have a team to win the European Cup within ten years. Needless to say, they got it wrong. Perhaps they underestimated just how poor Irish football was, both on and off the field. Little has changed since then, and Irish clubs still have more or less no profile in Europe.

So, is it sensible to talk of Irish clubs having a level of success in Europe? It would be easy to sit back and accept that the size and state of the game in the republic mitigate against it. It could be argued that the drain of Ireland's best talent to the English leagues, leaving the domestic league bereft of quality, is inevitable and unstoppable, and certainly it has been going on for some time now.

Without top quality players, you cannot compete. Without money, you cannot keep the players. Moreover, the perceived lack of quality in Irish football keeps the public focusing its attention on the more glamorous English Premiership. Clubs that can barely muster crowds of 3,000 for top league clashes have no right to look to Europe.

Indeed that pessimistic outlook has dominated the wider view of the game in Ireland. Efforts to raise the profile of Irish soccer have generally failed. Merely claiming that the football on offer is better than people think is not a credible strategy. A more proactive approach is desperately needed.

With Uefa apparently intent on pandering to the big clubs for fear of seeing a breakaway European super league, it is the small clubs who suffer. The cynical might argue that clubs, like those in Ireland, cannot suffer from the loss of something they have never had. This view would brook no argument if the clubs harboured no aspirations in this direction. If Irish clubs do dream of European success, and they should, then its time for them to think more seriously about how this can be achieved.

The exclusion of smaller clubs is what many of the biggest clubs want. Television demands big games. Big games produce money. Internazionale must curse the part-timers of Helsingborg – the minnows who ended their Champion's League involvement. Perhaps Inter fans would not agree, but such shocks are what make the game great. The success of the Swedish champions should be an inspiration to Irish clubs.

So, what should Irish clubs do? How can they make the breakthrough in Europe and win over a sceptical domestic public? The answers lie in European competition itself. A respectable level of success in Europe the Irish game some much-needed credibility.

We are not talking about winning the Champions' League. Rather, Irish clubs should be aiming at one day reaching the group phase of the competition. Irish sports fans love to get behind a good cause. Whichever club might make the breakthrough could be guaranteed an audience and support – and consequently, a major injection of cash. Belief that they really are watching a relatively high standard of football would surely have the knock-on effect of attracting supporters for domestic games.

Great, you might say, but Irish clubs are a long way off qualifying for the Champions' League proper. That is irrefutable, but it does not have to be that way. Ten years ago, who in Europe had heard of Rosenborg? The Norwegians are now a side that commands respect. Although not a glamour club, they are one that many big clubs would seek to avoid. Gritty, organised and hardworking, they have shown in recent years that they can upset the best. Emulating their success requires greater levels of professionalism amongst Irish clubs on both the football and business sides.

Let's take the business side first. Pumping what little money the clubs have into improved facilities is all very well, but this is likely to result in little more than rows of empty seats rather than empty terraces. Lack of income is a major problem. Income from crowds of two or three thousand will never be enough.

Clubs must look to entice potential investors into both the infrastructure and playing sides. As efforts to try and relocate Wimbledon FC to Dublin proved, there are plenty of wealthy business people who might be persuaded to take up the cause. Short of that, club chairmen should seek to secure funding towards a believable but lofty goal. The advent of a European league is only a matter of time, they might argue, so how about backing their particular club to be Dublin's representative? Being the best in Ireland is patently not enough.

On the football side, clubs could do a lot worse than investing in their coaching. Perhaps with the help of the FAI, they should seek to ensure that club and youth coaches get the best footballing education possible. At the very least, they should attain Uefa coaching credentials.

After all, Gerard Houllier and Arsene Wenger were not noted players, but their coaching abilities are unquestionable. The success of Brian Kerr's Irish youth sides is another example. Organisation and fitness levels can make teams very hard to beat – look at Rosenborg. Good coaching should be able to attain both. Being a difficult side to beat can take a club a long way and is the stepping stone to greater things. If Irish clubs had this quality, then qualification for the first group stage of the Champions' League would not be beyond them.

Clubs should look more closely at how they nurture young talent. Increasing involvement in youth development would help. This can be expensive, especially as Irish youngsters are unlikely to go to a National League side if a British counterpart is sniffing around. That said, if the clubs can bring more players through the ranks, they will surely benefit and not just on the playing side.

Athletic fit youngsters with good football awareness will benefit the league. Good technical understanding of the basic skills and tactics of the games are a saleable commodity. Following Bohemians' victory over Kaiserslautern in Germany, the local media expressed surprise at the quality of the Dubliners' play and some German coaches said they would be sending scouts to Ireland. Irish clubs with professional set-ups should seek to sign these hopefuls to contracts, ensuring they gain some benefit should they move on.

At present, however, Irish clubs tend to undervalue their players and lose them for shockingly low transfers. Roy Keane went from Cobh to Nottingham Forest for a negligible fee. What price would you put on his head now? Current interest in Shelbourne's Richie Foran suggests a fee of around £100,000 would secure his signature.

English clubs buying players of similar quality for the second and third divisions would probably pay more. Moreover, clubs should also pay more attention to how deals are done when selling players. The potential of the sell-on clause is an area that could do with a little more research. Ultimately, realistic transfer fees for locally developed talent would go a long way toward bringing through more talent. It also might be used to keep certain players within the National League.

There are many other potential strategies that Irish clubs could follow. Sending delegations to Norway to find out how the profile and quality of Norwegian football has been raised would be a good starting point. Failing to take action will leave the game in the republic forever in the doldrums. Improvement will not come overnight – it took Rosenborg eight years to finally start reaping the benefits of their improved methods – but a concerted and focused approach to improving the lot of Irish football would eventually yield results.

What do you reckon? Mail Paul at littleatlarge@dangerhere.com 
or post your thoughts on our message boards.


 

Click here for more Little at Large